Copyright Brian J. Kirby. With questions, contact Prof. Kirby here.
This material may not be distributed without the author's consent. When linking to these pages, please use the URL http://www.kirbyresearch.com/textbook.
This web posting is a draft, abridged version of the Cambridge University Press text. Follow the links to buy at Cambridge or Amazon or Powell's or Barnes and Noble. Contact Prof. Kirby
here.
[Return to Table of Contents]
Jump To:
[Kinematics]
[Couette/Poiseuille Flow]
[Fluid Circuits]
[Mixing]
[Electrodynamics]
[Electroosmosis]
[Potential Flow]
[Stokes Flow]
[Debye Layer]
[Zeta Potential]
[Species Transport]
[Separations]
[Particle Electrophoresis]
[DNA]
[Nanofluidics]
[Induced-Charge Effects]
[DEP]
[Solution Chemistry]
2.1 Steady pressure- and boundary-driven flow through long channels [Couette/Poiseuille top]
The Navier-Stokes equations can be simplified when flow proceeds through an infinitely long channel of uniform
cross-section, owing to the geometric elimination of the nonlinear term in the equation. Couette and Poiseuille
flows, in turn, describe flow driven by boundary motion or pressure gradients.
2.1.1 Couette flow
Couette flow is the flow of fluid in between two infinite parallel flat plates driven by the motion of one or more of the
plates. Consider steady flow between two infinite parallel moving plates with a uniform pressure field. Assume one
plate is located at y = h and moves in the x-direction with speed uH, and the other plate is located at y = -h and
moves in the x-direction with speed uL. A schematic of this flow is shown in Figure 2.1. Ignoring body forces, the
Navier-Stokes equations are
 | (2.1) |
Simplified equation
We solve this flow by making two simplifying approximations. The resulting solution satisfies the boundary
condition and governing equation and thus validates these approximations. We begin by assuming that the fluid
motion is only in the x-direction. Since the flow is only in the x-direction, we can replace with u, resulting
in
 | (2.2) |
Our next simplifying approximation is that the velocity profile is independent of x. The first three terms of the
equation can therefore be assumed zero, in turn, because (a) the flow is assumed steady, (b) u is assumed
independent of x, and (c) the pressure is assumed uniform. Thus, the simplified governing equation for this flow
is
 | (2.3) |
In this case, we have chosen a problem statement and geometry that allows much of the Navier-Stokes equation to
be ignored; in so doing, we have a system that is much simplier mathematically.
Solution
Equation 2.3 can be integrated directlyto give a linear distribution:
 | (2.8) |
Applying boundary conditions at the top plate:
 | (2.9) |
as well as the bottom:
 | (2.10) |
we find
Physical interpretation
The Couette flow has no acceleration, no net pressure forces, and no net convective transport of momentum.
Because of this, the governing equation also says that the net viscous force on any control volume is also zero. For
spatially-uniform viscosity, this means that the concavity (i.e., the second derivative with respect to y) of the flow
distribution is zero. If we draw a control volume around the flow, we can see that the top surface applies a force per
unit area to the fluid given by η , and the bottom surface applies a force per unit area to the fluid given by
-η . The velocity profile of a Couette flow is not a function of the viscosity, but the force required to move the
plates is.
Flow kinematics and viscous stresses
The Couette flow has a simple functional form. While a tensor description is not necessary for this flow, our
Couette flow is a good opportunity to use the tensor description in a simple case.
Evaluating the strain rate and viscous stress tensor, we obtain
 | (2.12) |
or
 | (2.13) |
The only nonzero viscous stress terms are the τxy and τyx terms, each of which has a value equal to the viscosity
times the velocity gradient:
This expression has no x- or y-dependence. The viscous stress is uniform, consistent with the governing equation,
which can also be written as = 0. This flow exhibits both shear strain (off-diagonal elements of ) and rotation
(off-diagonal elements of ω).
Reynolds number
The Reynolds numberis defined as Re = ρUℓ∕η, where U and ℓ are the characteristic velocity and length,
respectively, which come from the boundary conditions (see the appendix, Section E.2.1). By characteristic, we
mean that the velocity and length are representative of (a) the inertial forces, as represented by the dynamic pressure
(1∕2)ρU2, and (b) the viscous forces, as represented by the viscous stress ηU∕ℓ. In both cases, we care most
precisely about velocity differences.
For Couette flow, we define the characteristic velocity U as U = , which is a measure of the total
difference between the fastest part of the flow and the slowest part of the flow. The dynamic pressure (1∕2)ρU2 tells
us the amount the pressure would increase if the fast fluid was slowed down along a streamline to the
speed of the slow fluid, and thus gives a measure of the inertia of the fast fluid as compared to the slow
fluid.
For Couette flow, we define the characteristic length ℓ as ℓ = h, since the viscous stresses are τxy = η
everywhere in the flow.
Substituting these into the definition of the Reynolds number, we get that the Reynolds number for Couette flows
is:
 | (2.15) |
For Couette flows, the Reynolds number indicates whether the laminar solution derived above is observed
experimentally, or if a turbulent solution is observed. For Re < 100, the solution derived above is the one observed.
In microsystems, this is typically satisfied, owing to the small h values used.
2.1.2 Poiseuille flow
Poiseuille flow describes the flow resulting from pressure gradients in a tube, and Hagen-Poiseuille flow refers
specifically to pressure-driven flow through a tube of circular cross-section. This type of flow is characteristic of
pressure-driven flow through channels in microdevices, and this solution (Figure 2.2) is the fundamental source for
all of the results in Chapter 3.
To solve for the Hagen-Poiseuille flow, we assume that all flow is in the z-direction (ur = 0, uθ = 0) and that
gradients in the θ- and z-directions are zero. The Navier-Stokes equations are:
 | (2.26) |
Simplified equation
Because of the geometric simplifications, the convection and unsteady terms are all zero, leaving:
 | (2.27) |
For radially symmetric flow, we write this as:
 | (2.28) |
Solution
To solve, we assume that is uniform, and integrate the r terms:
 | (2.29) |
rearrange,
 | (2.30) |
and integrate again to find
 | (2.31) |
By requiring that (a) uz be bounded at r = 0 and (b) uz = 0 at r = R, we solve and find
We can integrate this distribution spatially (Exercise 2.5) to find the flowrate Q:
and normalize by the area (Exercise 2.6) to generate the area-averaged velocity uz:
Physical interpretation
The steady Poiseuille flow has no convective transport of momentum, nor acceleration. The governing equation
highlights the balance between the net pressure forces and the net viscous force. Since the pressure gradient (and
thus the net pressure force) is uniform, the derivative of the shear stress is uniform, and thus the concavity (i.e., 2nd
derivative with respect to y) of the distribution is uniform. If we draw a control volume around the fluid
in its entirety, we can see that the net pressure force on the control volume is dz(πR2), while the
viscous force per unit area that the wall applies to the fluid is - , and the net viscous force in total is
- dz(πR2).
Flow kinematics and viscous stresses
There are only two nonzero viscous stress terms for Poiseuille flow— the τrz and τzr terms. Each is given by
the viscosity times the velocity gradient:
 | (2.35) |
Evaluating the derivative, we obtain
For Poiseuille flows, the viscous stress varies linearly, with a minimum of zero at r = 0 and a maximum of  at
r = R. The velocity distribution of a Poiseuille flow is parabolic.
Reynolds number
As was the case with the Couette flow, we need a characteristic velocity and a characteristic length to use to
define theReynolds number.
Unlike for the Couette flow, the problem statement does not prescribe any velocities; rather, it specifies a
pressure gradient. We therefore use the velocities from the solution to guide definition of the Reynolds
number. We typically define U = for Poiseuille flow and define ℓ = 2R for this flow. With these
definitions,
As was the case for Couette flow, Re for Poiseuille flow tells us whether the laminar flow distribution derived above
is observed—Re < 2300, the flow is laminar.
[Return to Table of Contents]
Jump To:
[Kinematics]
[Couette/Poiseuille Flow]
[Fluid Circuits]
[Mixing]
[Electrodynamics]
[Electroosmosis]
[Potential Flow]
[Stokes Flow]
[Debye Layer]
[Zeta Potential]
[Species Transport]
[Separations]
[Particle Electrophoresis]
[DNA]
[Nanofluidics]
[Induced-Charge Effects]
[DEP]
[Solution Chemistry]
Copyright Brian J. Kirby. Please contact Prof. Kirby here with questions or corrections.
This material may not be distributed without the author's consent. When linking to these pages, please use the URL http://www.kirbyresearch.com/textbook.
This web posting is a draft, abridged version of the Cambridge University Press text. Follow the links to buy at Cambridge or Amazon or Powell's or Barnes and Noble. Contact Prof. Kirby
here.
|