Copyright Brian J. Kirby. With questions, contact Prof. Kirby here.
This material may not be distributed without the author's consent. When linking to these pages, please use the URL http://www.kirbyresearch.com/textbook.
This web posting is a draft, abridged version of the Cambridge University Press text. Follow the links to buy at Cambridge or Amazon or Powell's or Barnes and Noble. Contact Prof. Kirby
here. Click here for the most recent version of the errata for the print version.
[Return to Table of Contents]
Jump To:
[Kinematics]
[Couette/Poiseuille Flow]
[Fluid Circuits]
[Mixing]
[Electrodynamics]
[Electroosmosis]
[Potential Flow]
[Stokes Flow]
[Debye Layer]
[Zeta Potential]
[Species Transport]
[Separations]
[Particle Electrophoresis]
[DNA]
[Nanofluidics]
[Induced-Charge Effects]
[DEP]
[Solution Chemistry]
Unlike Poiseuille flow (Chapter 2), for which the mean velocity for a given pressure gradient decreases as the
channel dimension decreases, the mean electroosmotic velocity is independent of length scale as long as the thin
double layer approximation applies. This means that as length scales are reduced, electric fields become much more
effective at generating fluid flow than pressure gradients are. This property is central to the performance of an
electroosmotic or electrokinetic pump, in which an electric field is applied along a capillary to generate flow and
pressure. This is a simple flow case, but one that shows compellingly how length scale can dictate the relative
importance of flow phenomena.
6.5.1 A planar electrokinetic pump
Consider a system in which an electric field E = ΔV∕L is applied across an open rectangular microchannel
withdepth 2d, width w, length L, and cross sectional area A = wd. Assume that λD ≪ d ≪ w ≪ L,
and no pressure gradient is applied. As we have discussed previously, the boundary condition can be
modeled with the equation wall = μEO . If the microchannel area is uniform, the electroosmotic velocity
in the channel is uniform (this is a degenerate case of a Couette flow, in which both surfaces move
with the same velocity). Summarizing the relations for the pressure drop across the capillary (Δp), the
velocity distribution across the capillary cross-section, and the total flow rate in this system (Qtot), we
have:
 | (6.20) |
 | (6.21) |
and
 | (6.22) |
Now suppose the downstream port of this capillary is closed, and we attach a pressure transducer to this port. For
simplicity (and because L ≫ w) we consider only the region of the capillary that is far from the ends, and we assume
all flow is strictly in the x-direction. In this case, the net flow through any cross-section must be zero,
because the port is closed. The electroosmotic flow equation still holds, but the assumption that the
pressure gradient is zero does not. In fact, an adverse pressure gradient and a reverse Poiseuille flow must
coincide with the electroosmotic flow to satisfy mass conservation. For a 2-D system (plates of width
w separated by 2d, where w ≫ d), the electroosmotic and pressure-driven contributions to the flow
are:
 | (6.23) |
and
 | (6.24) |
Integrating and setting the net flowrate equal to zero, the downstream pressure generated by the flow is given
by
In the thin double layer limit, an electric field applied across a closed microchannel generates a downstream pressure
proportional to the applied voltage and inversely proportional to the channel depth squared. A similar relation can be
derived for a circular capillary of radius r (see Exercise 6.26):
We have thus derived two limiting cases: an open capillary, for which the generated flowrate is maximum, but the
pressure generated is zero, and a closed microchannel, for which the generated flowrate is zero, but the pressure
generated is maximum. In the general case for which Qtot is nonzero and Δp is nonzero, the solution is a linear
combination of these two solutions, with an example flowfield shown in Figure 6.7. We can write for the planar
electrokinetic pump:
 | (6.35) |
and this can be rearranged as:
 | (6.36) |
where Qmax is the maximum flow rate (at Δp = 0), given by
 | (6.37) |
and Δp-max is given by
 | (6.38) |
Equation 6.36 is shown graphically in Figure 6.8. Since the power generated by a pump is given by
ΔpQ, Equation 6.36 can be used to derive the maximum power point. Since the power input to an
electrokinetic pump is given by the current-voltage product VI, the thermodynamic efficiency can be defined
as
where the current I is given by I = V∕R and the resistance R is given by R = L∕σA in the bulk conductivity limit.
Efficiencies of electrokinetic pumps range approximately from 0.01%–5%.
6.5.2 Types of electrokinetic pumps
The analysis above is for a single capillary, but these results can be extended analytically to other geometries.
Geometries used have included single capillaries [44], arrays of capillaries, capillaries packed with
microparticles [45, 46, 47], planar microfabricated structures, and porous polymer monoliths. Two examples of
these are shown in Figure 6.9. These devices have been used for chemical separations [47] and many other
applications.
Experimentally, these pumps can be evaluated by monitoring flowrates and pressures as applied voltages are
varied. Related work on electrokinetic pumps from our research group can be found here.
[Return to Table of Contents]
Jump To:
[Kinematics]
[Couette/Poiseuille Flow]
[Fluid Circuits]
[Mixing]
[Electrodynamics]
[Electroosmosis]
[Potential Flow]
[Stokes Flow]
[Debye Layer]
[Zeta Potential]
[Species Transport]
[Separations]
[Particle Electrophoresis]
[DNA]
[Nanofluidics]
[Induced-Charge Effects]
[DEP]
[Solution Chemistry]
Copyright Brian J. Kirby. Please contact Prof. Kirby here with questions or corrections.
This material may not be distributed without the author's consent. When linking to these pages, please use the URL http://www.kirbyresearch.com/textbook.
This web posting is a draft, abridged version of the Cambridge University Press text. Follow the links to buy at Cambridge or Amazon or Powell's or Barnes and Noble. Contact Prof. Kirby
here. Click here for the most recent version of the errata for the print version.
|