Donations keep this resource free! Give here:
Copyright Brian J. Kirby. With questions, contact Prof. Kirby here.
This material may not be distributed without the author's consent. When linking to these pages, please use the URL http://www.kirbyresearch.com/textbook.
This web posting is a draft, abridged version of the Cambridge University Press text. Follow the links to buy at Cambridge or Amazon or Powell's or Barnes and Noble. Contact Prof. Kirby
here. Click here for the most recent version of the errata for the print version.
[Return to Table of Contents]
Jump To:
[Kinematics]
[Couette/Poiseuille Flow]
[Fluid Circuits]
[Mixing]
[Electrodynamics]
[Electroosmosis]
[Potential Flow]
[Stokes Flow]
[Debye Layer]
[Zeta Potential]
[Species Transport]
[Separations]
[Particle Electrophoresis]
[DNA]
[Nanofluidics]
[InducedCharge Effects]
[DEP]
[Solution Chemistry]
Here we must define the difference between several terms, namely thezeta potential, the electrokinetic potential, the
interfacial potential, the double layer potential, and the surface potential. These terms have different
meanings and are used differently by various authors. Further, some of these terms become equivalent if
specific models are used to describe the interface, but have different meanings if other models are
used.
Surfacepotential (or, equivalently, interfacial potential or double layer potential) typically implies the difference
between the potential in a bulk, electroneutral solution and the potential at the wall. The wall here is defined as the
point at which the material in the solid phase ends. We write the surface potential in this text as φ_{0}, but the
reader should be aware that this potential is often denoted in other sources as ϕ_{0}, ψ, ψ_{0}, or ζ. The
surface potential is well defined if the electrical double layer is thin, since interfacial effects decay
on a shorter length scale than any spatial variation in the bulk electric field. In this case, we define a
“bulk” location that simultaneously is (a) close enough to the wall that it experiences the same extrinsic
electric field as the wall; and (b) is far enough from the wall that the net charge density is zero and
interfacial effects on the potential can be neglected. The surface potential is also well defined if the bulk
electric field is uniform, as is the case for flow over an infinite flat plate or over a small particle. In this
case, the bulk is straightforward to define even when double layers are thick. When double layers are
thick and the extrinsic field is nonuniform, the definition of a surface potential becomes much more
difficult.
Electrokineticpotential is specific to a phenomenon (e.g., electroosmosis or electrophoresis). For
electroosmosis, the electrokinetic potential is given by μ_{EO}η_{bulk}∕ε_{bulk}, which is the potential that need
be inserted into aHelmholtzSmoluchowskitype equation (e.g., Equation 6.14) to explain observed
electroosmotic flow. We denote the electrokinetic potential as ζ [V] in this text. The electrokinetic
potential has units of voltage by definition, but need not correspond to a physical potential or potential
difference.
The distinction between the electrokinetic potential and the surface potential is critical—φ_{0} is a measure of the
interfacial potential while ζ is a measure of fluid or particle flow—but this distinction is confounded by widely
varying use of terminology and symbology as well as the fact that the two quantities are equivalent if the
spatiallyuniform property, integral analysis of Chapter 6 is employed. The terms electrokinetic potential, zeta
potential, double layer potential, surface potential, and interfacial potential are often used interchangeably, and the
meaning implied by specific use of these terms is often ambiguous. We use the terms surface potential, interfacial
potential, or double layer potential and the symbol φ_{0} to denote the difference in potential between the
bulk solution and the interface between the wall and the solution. We use the terms zeta potential or
electrokinetic potential and the symbol ζ to denote μ_{EO}η_{bulk}∕ε_{bulk} for electroosmosis or μ_{EP}η_{bulk}∕ε_{bulk} for
electrophoresis.
Recall from Chapter 6 that the bulk velocity for electroosmosis over a flat plate for a system with uniform fluid
properties and ion distributions described by Boltzmann statistics is given by μ_{EO} = εφ_{0}∕η, which implies
that
for such a system. However, ion crowding or adhesion limits the application of Boltzmann statistics, and the high
electric fields and high ion densities give the potential for breakdown of the uniformproperty assumption employed
in Chapter 6. Related work on zeta potential from our research group can be found here.
[Return to Table of Contents]
Jump To:
[Kinematics]
[Couette/Poiseuille Flow]
[Fluid Circuits]
[Mixing]
[Electrodynamics]
[Electroosmosis]
[Potential Flow]
[Stokes Flow]
[Debye Layer]
[Zeta Potential]
[Species Transport]
[Separations]
[Particle Electrophoresis]
[DNA]
[Nanofluidics]
[InducedCharge Effects]
[DEP]
[Solution Chemistry]
Copyright Brian J. Kirby. Please contact Prof. Kirby here with questions or corrections.
This material may not be distributed without the author's consent. When linking to these pages, please use the URL http://www.kirbyresearch.com/textbook.
This web posting is a draft, abridged version of the Cambridge University Press text. Follow the links to buy at Cambridge or Amazon or Powell's or Barnes and Noble. Contact Prof. Kirby
here. Click here for the most recent version of the errata for the print version.
Ad revenue from these pages is used to support student research. The presence of an advertisement on these pages does not
constitute an endorsement by the Kirby Research Group or Cornell University.
Donations keep this resource free! Give here:
