Copyright Brian J. Kirby. With questions, contact Prof. Kirby here.
This material may not be distributed without the author's consent. When linking to these pages, please use the URL http://www.kirbyresearch.com/textbook.
This web posting is a draft, abridged version of the Cambridge University Press text. Follow the links to buy at Cambridge or Amazon or Powell's or Barnes and Noble. Contact Prof. Kirby
here. Click here for the most recent version of the errata for the print version.
[Return to Table of Contents]
Jump To:
[Kinematics]
[Couette/Poiseuille Flow]
[Fluid Circuits]
[Mixing]
[Electrodynamics]
[Electroosmosis]
[Potential Flow]
[Stokes Flow]
[Debye Layer]
[Zeta Potential]
[Species Transport]
[Separations]
[Particle Electrophoresis]
[DNA]
[Nanofluidics]
[Induced-Charge Effects]
[DEP]
[Solution Chemistry]
Chemical species are transported through fluid systems owing to both diffusion and convection, as described below.
We omit consideration of chemical reactions for the purposes of this discussion.
11.1.1 Species diffusion
Species diffusion refers to the net migration of species owing to Brownian motion in the system. The thermal energy
in the system leads to species moving in random directions with temporally varying velocities whose
magnitude are proportional to the energy of the system (and therefore proportional to RT ). The net
effect is a net migration of species away from high-concentration regions and toward low-concentration
regions.
11.1.2 Convection
In addition to the random fluctuations of chemical species due to thermal motion, the deterministic motion of
chemical species due to fluid flow and electric fields (i.e., convection) also leads to a species flux, as the species are
carried along when the fluid moves. Considering chemical species as passive scalars (i.e., parameters
described with scalar variables that are simply carried along with the fluid) leads to the passive scalar
diffusion equation (Equation 4.6), which describes chemical species diffusion in the absence of electric
fields.
In the presence of electric fields, though, charged ions move in response to the Coulomb force they feel in that
electric field— a process termed electrophoresis. The forceexerted by an electric field on an ion is (cf.
Section 5.1.10)
 | (11.1) |
where e is the magnitude of the charge of an electron(e = 1.6×10-19C) and z is the charge number or valenceof the
ion (for example, z = 1 for Na+ and z = -2 for SO4-2). The steady-state response of the ion occurs at
equilibrium between two equal and opposite forces: the Coulomb force from the electric field and the
“drag” force caused by the solvent molecules. This drag force cannot be predicted precisely without
detailed molecular dynamics calculations, but one achieves results within an order of magnitude for
most ions if one simply models the ion as a sphere in Stokes flow with a radius commensurate with its
size:
 | (11.2) |
where i is the velocity of the ion i and rhydrated is the hydrated radius of the ion, i.e., the radius of the ion and any
water molecules that are bound to it at equilibrium. Clearly, the Stokes flow equations do not apply at the length
scale of an ion; however, the effects have the same scaling, and the magnitude of the “drag” force is surprisingly
close, despite the incorrectness of the model.
At equilibrium, which for an ion is essentially instantaneous, the electromigratory velocity of species i caused by
the electric field is written as
where μEP,i [m2∕Vs] is termed the electrophoretic mobility. The motion of an ion (or a charged particle) in an
electric field is termedelectrophoresis. Example electrophoretic mobilities are listed in Table 11.1.
|
|
|
| | Ion | μEP(m2∕Vsec) | Ion | μEP(m2∕Vsec) |
|
|
|
| | H+ | 36.3×10-8 | OH- | -20.5×10-8 |
| Na+ | 5.2×10-8 | Br- | -8.1×10-8 |
| Li+ | 4.0×10-8 | Cl- | -7.9×10-8 |
| Ca+2 | 3.1×10-8 | NO3- | -7.4×10-8 |
| Cu+2 | 2.8×10-8 | HCO3- | -4.6×10-8 |
| La+3 | 2.3×10-8 | SO4-2 | -4.1×10-8 |
|
|
|
| | |
Table 11.1: Electrophoretic mobilities for some sample ions at 298K at infinite dilution in water. Values
calculated from [114]. Note that the electrophoretic mobilities of H+ and OH- are really effective
mobilities. The observed effective mobilities are anomalously high because, in water, these ions can
propagate by reactive mechanisms such as theGrotthus mechanism. Note (for comparison) that μEO for
glass-water interfaces might typically be approximately 4×10-8m2∕Vsec.
Given the motion of the ion with respect to the solvent, the total velocity of the ion i is given
by
where refers strictly to the velocity of the fluid and i refers to the total velocity of the ion.
11.1.3 Relating diffusivity and electrophoretic mobility: the viscous mobility
Though they find application in different flux terms, species diffusivity and electrophoretic mobility are closely
related phenomena, and can be calculated from one another with simple equations. Diffusivity is a measure of a
species’ ability to move randomly because of random thermal molecular motion, and is used to describe diffusive
fluxes of species. Electrophoretic mobility is a measure of the species’ ability to move in response to
an electric field, and is a component of convective fluxes of species. The molecular collisions that
tend to limit both of these motions are the same. The difference is the driving force—thermal motion
(proportional to the thermal energy of a mole of ions, and therefore proportional to RT ) vs Coulomb force
(proportional to the charge of a mole of ions zF ). Consistent with this, thediffusivity of a species and
itselectrophoretic mobility are related to a single property and to each other by theNernst-Einstein
relation:
 | (11.5) |
On a per mole basis, we can equivalently write
We call μi [m∕N s] theviscous mobility of species i. The viscous mobility measures the extent to which a species
can move in the solvent in response to the force—it is a viscous property of the ion and the solvent, and 1∕μi
[N s∕m] is a molecular scale analog of the drag coefficient that might be defined for a macroscopic object. In fact, a
viscous mobility can be defined for a macroscopic object, for example, for a sphere of radius a in Stokes flow (see
Section 8.3.1), the viscous mobility is given by μ = .
The Nernst-Einstein relation applies rigorously for species that can be modeled as being a point charge. The
point charge assumption is correct for small ions and is approximately correct for proteins (even though the charge
on a protein in general is distributed). However, it fails when the hydrodynamic effects of diffusion and the
electrostatic effects of electrophoresis behave differently owing to the structure of the molecule. It cannot, for
example, be used to relate the diffusivity of charged macromolecules like DNA to their electrophoretic mobility (see
Chapter 14) owing to the difference in the hydrodynamic and electrostatic interactions of the components of the
polyelectrolyte.
[Return to Table of Contents]
Jump To:
[Kinematics]
[Couette/Poiseuille Flow]
[Fluid Circuits]
[Mixing]
[Electrodynamics]
[Electroosmosis]
[Potential Flow]
[Stokes Flow]
[Debye Layer]
[Zeta Potential]
[Species Transport]
[Separations]
[Particle Electrophoresis]
[DNA]
[Nanofluidics]
[Induced-Charge Effects]
[DEP]
[Solution Chemistry]
Copyright Brian J. Kirby. Please contact Prof. Kirby here with questions or corrections.
This material may not be distributed without the author's consent. When linking to these pages, please use the URL http://www.kirbyresearch.com/textbook.
This web posting is a draft, abridged version of the Cambridge University Press text. Follow the links to buy at Cambridge or Amazon or Powell's or Barnes and Noble. Contact Prof. Kirby
here. Click here for the most recent version of the errata for the print version.
|