Copyright Brian J. Kirby. With questions, contact Prof. Kirby here.
This material may not be distributed without the author's consent. When linking to these pages, please use the URL http://www.kirbyresearch.com/textbook.
This web posting is a draft, abridged version of the Cambridge University Press text. Follow the links to buy at Cambridge or Amazon or Powell's or Barnes and Noble. Contact Prof. Kirby
here. Click here for the most recent version of the errata for the print version.
[Return to Table of Contents]
Jump To:
[Kinematics]
[Couette/Poiseuille Flow]
[Fluid Circuits]
[Mixing]
[Electrodynamics]
[Electroosmosis]
[Potential Flow]
[Stokes Flow]
[Debye Layer]
[Zeta Potential]
[Species Transport]
[Separations]
[Particle Electrophoresis]
[DNA]
[Nanofluidics]
[Induced-Charge Effects]
[DEP]
[Solution Chemistry]
In this section, we sum the Nernst-Planck equations for all species i, weighted by ziF , to obtain the charge
conservation equations. In so doing, we naturally obtain theconductivity σ or themolar conductivity
Λ.
11.3.1 Charge conservation equation
The Nernst-Planck equation (Equation 11.10) shows that the change in species concentration is given by a
divergence of species flux densities. Since the valence of species i is given by zi, and the charge of a mole of species
i is given by ziF , each species conservation equation also describes the charge transport owing to species i. Summing
over all species, we obtain
 | (11.16) |
The charge fluxes from this equation are shown in Figure 11.2.
If the fluid velocity is small as compared to the electrophoretic motion of the ions, Equation 11.16 can be
rearranged (Exercise 11.4) to give
 | (11.17) |
and, if the diffusivities of all species are the same and equal to D, Equation 11.18 becomes
Here, σ [C∕V m s] is the conductivity and is defined as σ = ∑iciziFμEP,i, and the charge density ρE is defined as
ρE = ∑iciziF . The electrical conductivity thus naturally comes from the charge conservation equation, and is
directly related to μEP,i. Physically, this is consistent with the notion that charge is conducted in an electrolyte
solution owing to ion motion—the higher the electrophoretic mobility of the ionic components, the higher the
conductivity of the solution.
11.3.2 Diffusivity, electrophoretic mobility, and molar conductivity
Molar conductivity Λ [m2 C∕V s mol] is definedsuch that
The molar conductivity is convenient if the species transport equation is to be solved simultaneous with the charge
conservation equation. The molar conductivity is proportional to the electrophoretic mobility, as we might expect,
since ohmic conductivity stems from the ability of charged ions to move in response to an electric
field:
Note that the molar conductivity is always positive, since z and μEP always have the same sign and their product is
always positive.
[Return to Table of Contents]
Jump To:
[Kinematics]
[Couette/Poiseuille Flow]
[Fluid Circuits]
[Mixing]
[Electrodynamics]
[Electroosmosis]
[Potential Flow]
[Stokes Flow]
[Debye Layer]
[Zeta Potential]
[Species Transport]
[Separations]
[Particle Electrophoresis]
[DNA]
[Nanofluidics]
[Induced-Charge Effects]
[DEP]
[Solution Chemistry]
Copyright Brian J. Kirby. Please contact Prof. Kirby here with questions or corrections.
This material may not be distributed without the author's consent. When linking to these pages, please use the URL http://www.kirbyresearch.com/textbook.
This web posting is a draft, abridged version of the Cambridge University Press text. Follow the links to buy at Cambridge or Amazon or Powell's or Barnes and Noble. Contact Prof. Kirby
here. Click here for the most recent version of the errata for the print version.
|