Copyright Brian J. Kirby. With questions, contact Prof. Kirby here.
This material may not be distributed without the author's consent. When linking to these pages, please use the URL http://www.kirbyresearch.com/textbook.
This web posting is a draft, abridged version of the Cambridge University Press text. Follow the links to buy at Cambridge or Amazon or Powell's or Barnes and Noble. Contact Prof. Kirby
here. Click here for the most recent version of the errata for the print version.
[Return to Table of Contents]
Jump To:
[Kinematics]
[Couette/Poiseuille Flow]
[Fluid Circuits]
[Mixing]
[Electrodynamics]
[Electroosmosis]
[Potential Flow]
[Stokes Flow]
[Debye Layer]
[Zeta Potential]
[Species Transport]
[Separations]
[Particle Electrophoresis]
[DNA]
[Nanofluidics]
[Induced-Charge Effects]
[DEP]
[Solution Chemistry]
Many separation modes exist, each of which uses a different approach to give large or unique Δu. Much of the
phenomena that predict w(t) are general, and so we begin by describing these band broadening phenomena, which
compete with the separation technique and limit the resolution. Since these broadening phenomena involve
dispersion and diffusion in the transport of the analyte, we consider these mass transport phenomena. For a model
problem, namely a microchip electrophoretic separation, we consider in turn below the effects of analyte diffusion,
diffusion with electrophoresis, and finally diffusion and electrophoretic separation with dispersive effects like
pressure-driven flow or geometric turns.
12.2.1 Analyte transport: quiescent flow, no electric field
We start by considering quiescent flow to describe how analyte bands diffuse in the absence of separation or
dispersion. Consider a 1-D distribution of the concentration c of a sample bolus of width w0 and concentration
c0 centered at x = 0 at time t = 0. The total number of moles of analyte per unit area Γ is given by
Γ = c0w0.
The governing equation for the evolution of the species concentration is the Nernst-Planck equation:
 | (12.2) |
Noting that i is zero given no flow and no electric field, and simplifying to one dimension, we get
 | (12.3) |
which is just a 1-D passive scalar diffusion equationas discussed in Chapter 4. The solution for the distribution of c
at large t is given by
If we take the limit w0 → 0 as Γ is held constant, this solution is valid for all t. This solution is obtained by
performing a similarity transform on the PDE to obtain an integrable ODE. From this solution, we can conclude that
the peak concentration diminishes as and the width widens as . Specifically, the FWHM (full width at
half-maximum) w is given by w = 4 and the peak is given by . Thus diffusion affects the separation
in two ways. First, because of the peak concentration dependence, our ability to experimentally detect the analytes
decreases as . Second, the separation modality must separate species faster than or diffusion obscures the
separation.
12.2.2 Transport of analytes: electroosmoticflow andelectrophoresis
Given the results above for pure diffusion, we now add separation to the mix, giving us an idealized
result for electrophoretic separations. Here we consider the action of applied electric fields in thin
double layer devices, causing both a separation owing to electrophoresis and uniform velocity owing to
electroosmosis.
If electroosmosis in thethin-double-layer limit leads to a uniform velocity uEO and the convective transport of an
analyte is given by the netelectrokinetic velocity uEK = uEO +uEP, the solution is the same as Equation 12.4 except
for a spatial transformation:
Note that the peak decrease and spreading are unaffected by electroosmotic flow because electroosmotic flow is
uniform in the thin-double-layer limit. Thus electroosmotic flow is not dispersive in the thin double layer
limit.
From the above relation, we see that applying an electric field in the thin double layer limit leads
to electrokinetic motion of all analytes, leading to separation based on net electrokinetic mobility.
Separation of the centers of each bolus is given by ΔμEPEt. The width of each bolus expands with time
owing to diffusion, and for large t is given by 4 . Thus the band width scales with and the
resolution increases with as well. This is the ideal result, an example of which is shown in Figure 12.6.
Effect of pressure-driven flow
As discussed in Chapter 4, pressure-driven flow is dispersive, and pressure driven flow with a mean velocity
u(x) leads to both a net motion of the analyte and an increased effective diffusion. Since these effects often vary with
space and time, we write the solution as
where Deff = D per Equation 4.12. Section 12.4.1 discusses sources of pressure-driven flow in
microsystems. Related work on chemical separations from our research group can be found here.
[Return to Table of Contents]
Jump To:
[Kinematics]
[Couette/Poiseuille Flow]
[Fluid Circuits]
[Mixing]
[Electrodynamics]
[Electroosmosis]
[Potential Flow]
[Stokes Flow]
[Debye Layer]
[Zeta Potential]
[Species Transport]
[Separations]
[Particle Electrophoresis]
[DNA]
[Nanofluidics]
[Induced-Charge Effects]
[DEP]
[Solution Chemistry]
Copyright Brian J. Kirby. Please contact Prof. Kirby here with questions or corrections.
This material may not be distributed without the author's consent. When linking to these pages, please use the URL http://www.kirbyresearch.com/textbook.
This web posting is a draft, abridged version of the Cambridge University Press text. Follow the links to buy at Cambridge or Amazon or Powell's or Barnes and Noble. Contact Prof. Kirby
here. Click here for the most recent version of the errata for the print version.
|